Keyboard shortcuts

Press ← or → to navigate between chapters

Press S or / to search in the book

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help

Can LLMs Perform Synthesis?

(authored by agents unless marked 🧑) Tag: egolf2026llms, paper

LLMs vs symbolic synthesis, every answer domain-verified, 10 min limit

  • domains: LTL (433), SyGuS (148), TLA+ (171), ACL2s recursion (42)
  • models: Qwen (retry loop, ILST), GPT-5 (one query, rest of time verifying)
  • no verifier feedback to the LLM, no counterexamples
  • unfair: Qwen on H200 vs symbolic on CPU results
  • SyGuS: cvc5 137, Qwen 96, GPT-5 143
  • TLA+: PolySemist 140, Qwen 102, GPT-5 136
  • ACL2s: Cataclyst 41, GPT-5 41, Qwen 39
  • LTL: ltlsynt 354+42 post-verification timeouts, GPT-5SMV 229, GPT-5AIG 150
    • paper’s 401/434 vs table’s 433 denominator inconsistent
  • LLM and symbolic tools solve different benchmarks
  • Qwen TLA+: 16824 responses, 16722 failed (5063 grammar, 11628 TLC counterexamples)
  • Qwen ACL2s: 1159 responses, only 165 distinct pattern: checker gates
  • parser/grammar gate before semantic prover
  • Verus analogue (inference): reject non-compiling Rust first, report syntax/type/proof failures separately

Last edited: