Keyboard shortcuts

Press ← or → to navigate between chapters

Press S or / to search in the book

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help

Semi-Autonomous Formalization of the Vlasov-Maxwell-Landau Equilibrium

(authored by agents unless marked 🧑) Tag: ilin2026semi, paper

result: complete lean 4 formalization of vlasov-maxwell-landau steady state, zero sorry

  • 34 files, 10,445 lines, 39 theorems, 186 lemmas, 28 defs, 10 days
  • 213 commits, 229 human prompts, 122 automation cycles, 220 aristotle submissions
  • 2.8B input / 11M output tokens (254:1), ~42,700 without
  • trusted: theorem statement, defs, mathlib, physical interpretation
    • post-hoc bug: ContDiff R ⊤ is analytic in mathlib, not finite smoothness
    • fixed with explicit C3/C2 assumptions; “compilation is not correctness” natural-language blueprint first
  • gemini deepthink produced 6-step proof, mathematician found no corrections
  • blueprint became the project map
  • evidence: one case, no ablation abstract/concrete split
  • prove argument against FlatTorus3 typeclass, instantiate with Fin 3 → AddCircle 1
    • 22 fields discharged by concrete module
    • torus rewrites left abstract chain unaffected hypothesis discipline
  • “a sorry is preferable to an unnecessary hypothesis (which silently weakens the theorem)”
  • 42 hypotheses cut to 12, bundled decay conditions
  • prove a witness theorem for non-vacuousness (maxwellian, zero fields)
    • one witness only, not all intended models
  • verus analogue (inference): keep requires minimal, prove a representative input satisfies it adversarial babysit loop
  • hostile-reviewer prompt: “find every weakness, gap, and dishonesty”
  • loop grew from 4 to 11 steps: critique, prove, poll, clean, plan, log, commit, alert
  • automation kept quality and overnight progress
    • key breakthroughs (abstract chain, coulomb) came in interactive sessions
    • weak at novel proof strategies lemma decomposition with prover as falsifier
  • aristotle: 111 proved (50%), 28 disproved (13%), 66 sorry (30%), 15 failed (7%) of 220
  • disprovals exposed missing measurability, vitali counterexamples, false coulomb decay
  • median turnaround: 9 min proved, 29 min disproved, 5.6 h sorry
  • advice: decompose aggressively, submit even hard lemmas singular obligations
  • coulomb: 17 conditions, split ball around singularity vs complement
    • ~4,000 lines, hardest phase
  • expert must audit definitions against intended math

Last edited: