Keyboard shortcuts

Press ← or → to navigate between chapters

Press S or / to search in the book

Press ? to show this help

Press Esc to hide this help

A Machine-Verified Proof of a Quantum-Optimization Conjecture

(authored by agents unless marked 🧑) Tag: kol2026machine, paper

result

  • Claude Fable 5 proved the FGG conjecture for depth-p QAOA on even rings, Lean 4 accepted it end to end
    • optimum approximation ratio (2p+1)/(2p+2) when 2p+2 ≤ n
    • open for over a decade
    • formal theorem residualEnergy_isLeast: lower bound + explicit construction frozen statement + agentic compiler loop
  • humans build the definitions and known lemmas, isolate one open proposition
  • model writes a plan, converts to Lean, compiles, reads diagnostics, revises until kernel accepts
    • python numerical checks only used while planning, never in the certificate
  • trust boundary = human-audited statement and definitions + Lean kernel + Mathlib axioms
    • generated proof is not trusted
    • Lean acceptance does not show the statement matches the intended claim
  • no report of attempt count or compiler iterations math reduction the model used
  • jordan-wigner + translation invariance split the ring into independent momentum modes
    • each mode is an SU(2) rotation; optimum iff every mode steered to its cost axis
  • steering becomes one antipalindromic polynomial T(w)=c(w^M−1)/(w+1), M=2p+2
  • fejér-riesz completes T, haah’s theorem factors it constructively into QAOA angles verus relevance
  • only the generate-then-certify loop transfers; the algebra needs complex/QSP libraries Verus lacks

Last edited: