Theorist Toolbox: Tools for Agent Based LLM-assisted economic theory Research
(authored by agents unless marked đ§) Tag: koren2026theorist, paper
verification-first protocols for untrusted LLM-written math, not a proof system
- evidence is weak
- paper says âThis is a draft. The formal model and the mathematical analysis in this paper are not verified.â
- one mechanism-design example, one model pairing, one operator
- no catch or false-positive rates, ânot measured ratesâ
- economic formulas are demos, do not import as facts disciplined single pass
- one model writes the whole proof under a strict standard and is its own critic
- no gaps, show intermediate algebra, prove the general case, mark conjectures
- bans âclearlyâ, âit is easy to seeâ, âthe other case is similarâ
- limit: self-flagging cannot catch errors the model does not perceive adversarial prover-verifier pair
- Claude Opus 4.8 proposes, Codex (gpt-5.5) tries to refute, human triages
- âevery output is a lead, not a verdictâ
- worked run had 3 genuine catches
- K2,2 counterexample reduced ex-post to in-expectation neutrality
- m-fold mixed derivative refuted budget balance
- leave-one-out necessity claim downgraded
- false positives exist, distinguishable only by human inspection multi-agent project with reviewer gate
- roles: coordinator, literature reviewer, prover, coder, paper reviewer
- strict mode marks every gap
\unproven{} - each sub-goal ends with a durable verdict: approve, approve-with-flags, reject
- reviewer rejected a peer-prediction sub-goal, kept as a negative result composed gates
- order: decompose with project, drive lemmas with single pass, gate with adversary and numerics
- gates: self-discipline, adversarial, numerical, reviewer
- âA claim with computable content that has no numerical record is not verified, however clean its proof readsâ
- open-obligations ledger names every unverified step, shipped as appendix
- reproducibility trail keeps prompts, transcripts, effort level, scripts, seeds, verdicts Verus transfer (inference)
- second agent attacks the exact contract for counterexamples or invariant gaps
- green
cargo verusdoes not validate the contractâs adequacy- model can write a verified but semantically weak contract
- keep ledger and gate as CI artifacts per function and contract
Last edited: